1) Institut für Physikalische Chemie und Theoretische Chemie, TU Wien, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria
2) Dept. Matematicas, Univ. Islas Baleares, 07071 Palma, Baleares, Espana
3) Laboratoire de Physique des Solides et de Cristallogenese,
C.N.R.S., 1, pl. A.Briand, F-92195 Meudon CEDEX, France
The depollution of waste- and drinking water is a topic of utmost importance
nowadays. The possibilities and the limits of photo(electro)chemical pollutant degradation in
aqueous solutions based on transition metal oxide semiconductor catalysts in the form of
powder suspensions, immobilized powders (paints), and massive and nanostructured thin film
electrodes are discussed.
Reactions on the surface of semiconductors are always photoelectrochemical processes
if photons with energies above the bandgap are used for irradiation. In the case of electrolyte
suspended semiconductor particles (photocatalytic method) the global reaction is the result of
local photocurrents under open circuit condition taking place at individual particles [1,2]. Here,
the working point (mixed potential and local short circuit current) depends on both, the cathodic
(reduction process) and the anodic (photooxidation) characteristics of the semiconductor
particles.
The same holds for particles immobilized on a surface (macroscopic substrate) [1,2].
However, if this substrate is electrically conducting, the advantage is offered that an electrode
potential can be imposed to the electrode with the help of an appropriate counter electrode.
Thus, the working point of the photoelectrochemical reaction can be shifted to the potential
range where photon flux limited (plateau) currents flow. The ratio of photocurrents (and therefore
the IPCE) between this situation and the open circuit condition is 10 to 40 (depending on
counter electrode polarizability) and requires an external bias of typically a few hundred mV
between the two electrodes. The IPCE is mostly dependent on bulk semiconductor properties.
By contrast, nanostructured thin film electrodes are of a different nature. It is shown that
very small bias can push the IPCE into the plateau region, i.e. the polarograms under light are
very steep in the onset region. Therefore, operation in the open circuit mode might be
envisaged, if the reduction reaction is proceeding fast and at an optimal potential at the same
electrode surface.Moreover, large differences between photocurrents in supporting electrolyte
and photocurrents in the presence of organic additives (oxidizable pollutants) can be found, i.e.
a very succesful competition between pollutant oxidation and water oxidation (which is an
undesired side reaction).
All these specific features can be interpreted in terms of the different mechanisms of
electron-hole separation and charge transport in both type of electrodes.
For the estimation of the overall efficiency of an electrochemical photooxidation process,
either the IPCE and the fraction of the current that is used to drive the desired (oxidation)
reaction - the Faradaic efficiency (f), or the overall quantum efficiency of educt consumption /
product formation must be measured. With both types of electrodes, the Faradaic efficiency of
the photoreaction depends on the interaction of the pollutant with the semiconductor surface and
on the concentration of the pollutant.
The efficiency of a reactor carrying out such a process can be estimated on the basis of
quantum efficiency of educt consumption/product formation as a function of wavelength, bias
and pollutant concentration, and the spectral characteristics of a selected irradiation source. The
advantage of employing an electrochemical reactor is expected to justify the additional power
requirement which is small compared to the power needed for the irradiation source (except for
sunlight driven reactors).
We have measured the quantities IPCE, f, and quantum yield for several transition metal
oxide photocatalysts; examples and an outlook are given.
References
[1] M.Neumann-Spallart and O.Enea, J.Electrochem.Soc. 131,2767(1984)
[2] J.Desivestro and M.Neumann-Spallart, J.Phys.Chem. 89,3684(1985)
email: mns@cnrs-bellevue.fr